U.S. Asks Judge to Allow Sharing of Documents AT&T Gave FCC
The U.S. asked a federal judge to allow prosecutors to discuss with outside lawyers and consultants documents AT&T Inc. gave the Federal Communications Commission to support its proposed purchase of T-Mobile USA Inc.
The Justice Department said in a court filing today that the ability to discuss material would let it better respond to AT&T’s claims about the benefits of the proposed $39 billion deal during a trial of the government’s antitrust case.
“The FCC already permits outside lawyers and consultants to review defendant’s FCC filings,” the Justice Department argued. Being able to discuss the material with some of those lawyers “would not increase the pool of those who have the ability to access defendant’s models.”
The Justice Department subpoenaed the same documents in its preparation for the trial, which is scheduled to start Feb. 13. The request places “no additional burden” on AT&T, the government said in the filing.
The Justice Department sued Dallas-based AT&T and Bonn- based Deutsche Telekom AG’s T-Mobile unit on Aug. 31, saying a combination of the two companies would “substantially” reduce competition. The merger would make AT&T the biggest U.S. wireless carrier,.
The FCC, which must rule on whether the transfer of spectrum licenses from T-Mobile to AT&T serves the public interest, is still reviewing the transaction.
The case is company reveals its own. The U.S. is seeking simultaneous disclosure of final witness lists on Jan. 22.
The Justice Department sued AT&T and Bonn-based Deutsche Telekom AG’s T-Mobile unit on Aug. 31, saying a combination of the two companies would “substantially” reduce competition. Seven states and Puerto Rico joined the effort to block the deal, which would make AT&T the biggest U.S. wireless carrier.
AT&T is also defending against private antitrust lawsuits objecting to the deal filed by Sprint Nextel Corp. and Cellular South Inc. Huvelle hasn’t decided when those cases will be tried.
The case is U.S. v. AT&T Inc., 11-cv-01560, U.S. District Court, District of Columbia (Washington).
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Popular Posts
-
opinion Over the past week a rather pathetic little game of bluster, bluff and ultimately light blackmail has played itself out in Australia...
-
In the latest development in the lengthy saga involving Loudoun County and OpenBand, the cable and broadband provider filed a complaint agai...
-
ONE of Australia's biggest internet providers has been found by a judge to have misled consumers with an offer of "unlimited" ...
-
MANILA: Almost a month after entering a not guilty plea to an electoral sabotage charge, former Philippine president Gloria Macapagal Arroyo...
-
With a flurry of patent lawsuits dominating headlines in the industry, Ericsson has taken steps to place more emphasis on protecting its int...
No comments:
Post a Comment